Ideas For A 28th Amendment

1: No chance in any way shape or form.

2: How about nosotros simply let the people vote for who they desire catamenia? Repeal the term limit for President would be more preferable.

3: Who decides what The Balance is? Those in ability? Or the Mob rule route? Let'due south proceed it on a example by case footing the way it is now.

iv: How would you determine that "optimum"? Personally I have suggested before that we examine that top rated 5-ten countries pedagogy systems, accept the best from those, adjust it to the US's culture and implement them here.

5: Corporations wouldn't let this happen. Information technology gives them too much power as information technology stands.

ane> Your welcome to your stance. The intention would be for the actual use of the Subpoena is to exist near impossible and extremely rare. The level of power or authority that information technology would requite would be probably very appealing to states and governors.

two> For one matter, ability goes to the politicians heads, and they start to control and manipulate the people that are voting for them. It is non expert to have the exact same people re-elected endlessly over and over again; it is good when it is someone you like being in office, and it is not good when it is someone y'all do non like beingness in office. I practice not think people should be able to make a political office some kind of countless career or anything else of the like, but a temporary stay in part. Nearly voters exercise non care and just re-elect the incumbent endlessly until they retire, die or they tick-off the voter enough to vote against them in some way or another, and that is endless non-sense to me. In that location should not be people in office continually always since a dissimilar political era, like the common cold war. Sometimes sometime means, standards, condition-ques, systems, political stagnations/ruts, mentalities, political philosophies, so on and then along, all need to exist able to change and come to an terminate, when and equally necessary. And why not when and if in that location are possibilities of something better, more effective, more efficient, applicable, then on and so forth. Anyway, I would not listen there being some kind of footing for US Presidential term extensions. But, for nearly function, I think the 2 4-year terms limit is non necessarily a bad thing to accept in place equally it is right at present.

3> I know that the idea needs to be adult further. But, it definitely defeats the whole bespeak of the idea if it was decided past those in any ability or say-so, and especially if it was any mob dominion, the whole idea is to prevent that sort of thing in the first place. Information technology is not good to wait until it is way besides difficult to pass an amendment when something actually becomes more necessary to exist an amendment; the second amendment would have never passed today for example. (Not that I am against the 2nd subpoena or annihilation like that.) I only recollect it would be best to have an amendment to have Balances and Limitations in identify for Security, Privacy, and Liberty to Prevent and Avoid possible future problems involving Too much Security, Invasion of Privacy, and a lack of Liberty.

4> I was not sure what way would have been best idea or suggestion, I was still sorting things out and debating with myself from time to fourth dimension, but that would be a likely manner to get for a possible amendment, so I tin can agree with exactly that as a option.

v> This is Anti-Censorship not Anti-Copyright, the intention would be to further limit or preclude what can be subconscious or suppressed from public view or admission. People and Corporations would still agree their copyright, they only would be limited to what tin can actually be Copyrighted and also be hidden or vaulted abroad out of public view or admission. With this intended idea withal, some parts of copyright constabulary would come to no consequence, withal. Archiving or Setting upwards Databases for absolutely anything which are unremarkably censored for fifty-fifty existence Obscene, Vulgar, Inappropriate, Unsightly, Ungodly, hateful, etc. I am confronting anything existence censored, just I understand that I that things sometimes need to not be so hands seen on blow in whatsoever manner of speaking.