How A Background Check Fixes Guns Work

William Gordon, left, helps Steve Wrona as he looks at guns while visiting the K&W Gunworks store in Delray Beach, Fla., on Tuesday, the mean solar day President Obama appear executive activeness on guns. Joe Raedle/Getty Images hibernate explanation

toggle caption

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

William Gordon, left, helps Steve Wrona as he looks at guns while visiting the Thousand&W Gunworks store in Delray Beach, Fla., on Tuesday, the 24-hour interval President Obama announced executive action on guns.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Here's one topic Americans tin can bank on hearing about in next calendar week's State of the Union address: gun control. The reaction to President Obama's appear gun-control measures this week was swift and entirely every bit expected. Gun-control advocates and many Democrats applauded his efforts; gun-rights groups and many Republicans loudly denounced the orders as executive overreach.

Expanded groundwork checks are central to the president'south proposals. His social club doesn't rewrite existing laws, but it would augment the scope of who is in the gun-selling concern. It would require more gun sellers online and at gun shows to exist licensed (and perform checks) among other things.

"Permit me be clear: It's non where you lot are located merely what you are doing that determines whether you are engaged in the business of dealing in firearms," Attorney Full general Loretta Lynch told reporters this week.

Then would those actress checks bring downwards America'due south high levels of gun deaths? Gun policy experts who spoke to NPR say it could, merely if so, that it would only make a dent.

Here'due south a expect at the bear witness:

What research says

Two contempo studies provide evidence that background checks tin significantly curb gun violence. In one, researchers establish that a 1995 Connecticut law requiring gun buyers to get permits (which themselves required background checks) was associated with a xl percent turn down in gun homicides and a 15 percentage drop in suicides. Similarly, when researchers studied Missouri'due south 2007 repeal of its allow-to-purchase law, they found an associated increment in gun homicides by 23 per centum, too as a sixteen-per centum increase in suicides.

Those are some huge results — one practiced chosen the Missouri study "the strongest evidence that background checks really matter," as The New Republic reported — but as with lots of social-science research, there's some fuzziness every bit to what the results mean. One caveat is that these studies aren't almost background checks alone. Instead, they're about permit-to-purchase laws, under which people had to go to local law enforcement to get a permit and, therefore, a groundwork cheque.

That divergence might take impacted the results, explained Daniel Webster, a co-author on both studies. He said that beingness forced to get a permit from constabulary enforcement might practice more to deter a harbinger purchaser, for instance, than getting a check at a nearby shop.

Furthermore, he added that because and then many factors influence gun violence in different ways, it's hard to say how much the effects seen in Connecticut and Missouri would also happen in other states. In addition, a stand up your ground law enacted in Missouri in 2007 may have affected the results.

Withal, other academic research points to the laws' effectiveness likewise. In a 2015 assay of studies published over the course of 15 years, Webster and co-author Garen Wintemute found that expanding background checks could "take protective effects against lethal violence," and that permit-to-purchase laws in particular aid curb murders and suicides.

They also found that background checks help keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but that it's less certain whether that in turn leads to less violence.

In that location'south no perfect consensus on how well groundwork-check laws work. A 2000 study found that the 1994 Brady Act — which instituted not only background checks but waiting periods at first — did not reduce either homicide or suicide rates.

A CDC job force also plant in a 2003 review "inconsistent findings" equally to whether restricting gun admission through background checks works and insufficient evidence every bit to whether an array of other gun laws are effective. All the same, the CDC also said that its findings didn't hateful that gun laws don't work; rather, it said it needed to study the topic more.

Gun-policy researchers say they want to better study background checks (as well as many other policies), but a couple of hurdles stand in the way. Function of the problem is that good studies on the effectiveness of groundwork checks are pretty rare, according to Webster. One reason is that information technology's hard to find good test cases to written report.

"There's non a lot of change or variation [in laws] to study in recent times," he said. "The vast majority of these laws accept been on the books for many, many decades."

Another expert blamed the federal regime.

"One of the large problems is that the feds have not funded good research in this area," said David Hemenway, managing director of the Harvard Injury Command Enquiry Center and an expert on firearm-related injuries.

He points to federal restrictions, passed in 1996, that said the Centers for Affliction Control could not employ its funding to "abet or promote gun control." That acquired the CDC to dorsum away from gun enquiry almost entirely.

Outside organizations could option up that slack, Hemenway added, but they take non done and so. "The foundations haven't done a good job, because information technology's such a controversial area," he said. You don't desire to get involved. So we know some things, just we don't know as well every bit you would hope, given the enormity of the problem."

What recent shootings tell us

While some scholarly evidence suggests that background checks reduce law-breaking, seeing evidence in recent mass shootings is tougher. Every bit the New York Times found in a December investigation, the guns used in many contempo high-profile shootings were purchased legally past people who passed background checks.

Importantly, though, to the extent that background-check laws on the books might accept prevented mass shootings, it'south impossible to compile similar lists of incidents that would take occurred, were it non for those laws.

One other thing recent shootings say is that the electric current groundwork-cheque organization has some gaping holes in it. For case, FBI Director James Comey said in July 2015 that Dylann Roof, who is accused of killing nine at a Southward Carolina church terminal year, should not have passed a background check. Because information well-nigh his admission to a narcotics charge never reached an FBI examiner handling his cheque, as the Washington Mail reported, Roof was able to buy his gun.

In addition, some states are doing a poor job of submitting mental health records to NICS, as Politico's Kevin Cirilli writes, allowing some ill people to obtain guns. Cirilli points to Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho, who had a history of mental affliction before he killed 32 people in 2007.

As it stands, effectually 1.6 pct of 148 meg groundwork checks (that is, more 2 million) between 1994 and 2012 were denied, co-ordinate to federal statistics.

What the statistics say

1 of the most important questions to this discussion is impossible to respond precisely: how many guns are obtained without groundwork checks? While there aren't exact numbers on this, the figure could still be substantial. Using 2004 data, around 18 per centum of gun transactions involved private sellers, buyers' family members or friends or "other" sources, as the Washington Mail'south Glenn Kessler found terminal year. A majority of those sources were not licensed dealers (and therefore were non required to conduct background checks).

According to the figures cited past Kessler, seven percent of guns were obtained from gun shows (and many of those sales probably underwent background checks).

But data suggests that gun shows don't direct supply many of the guns used in crimes. Spokespeople from the National Rifle Clan and National Shooting Sports Foundation, a trade grouping for gun sellers, both as well pointed NPR to government information showing that less than 1 pct of prison inmates in 1997 said they got their guns from gun shows. Meanwhile, near lxxx pct obtained their guns from friends, family unit or "street" (illegal) sources.

All of this very well may mean that, as gun-rights advocates like Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio frequently bespeak out, criminals will only obtain guns through some avenue other than stores. That would mean that groundwork checks don't deter those people, and, therefore, that expanding them to more than online or private or gun show sales would do petty.

But there are other possible conclusions. A recent study of offenders in the Chicago area plant near obtained their guns from "personal connections, not from gun stores or by theft." While that report suggested to some that background checks are ineffective, one of the authors, Duke University'south Philip Cook, disagrees.

"This research demonstrates that current federal and local regulations are having a big outcome on the availability of guns to criminals in Chicago," he said in a release. "They can't buy their guns from stores, the way most people do, and are instead largely constrained to making private deals with acquaintances, who may or may not be willing and able to provide what they want."

Lawrence Keane, general counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, told NPR that "the industry has always been supportive of the groundwork check system," though he also said he has doubts about how much good the new proposals will do. In addition, his grouping is strongly opposed to making background checks universal.

Researchers Hemenway and Webster both call up the president's executive actions could have a pocket-sized effect on gun violence. For his part, Hemenway thinks universal background checks would be an effective start stride, but what he thinks would exist more than fruitful in the long term has more to do with innovation than legislative action.

"In the long run, we should be spending a lot of coin on figuring out technological fixes," he said. "The easiest one is to brand guns better for habitation protection and much, much less dangerous and less likely to be stolen."